Syndromic and Non-syndromic deafness, Molecular Aspects of Pendred Syndrome and its Reported Mutations

Shahzad Shaukat, Zareen Fatima*, Uruj Zehra**, Ahmed Bilal Waqar***

National Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, *KRL Hospital, Islamabad,

**Serena Hotel, Islamabad, ***Molecular Biology Division, Department of Pathology, Foundation University Medical College, Rawalpindi

Deafness means partial or complete hearing impairment and is one of the most prevalent sensory defects in humans. It can be due to genetic or environmental causes or a combination of both and may be Syndromic (associated with additional clinical features) or nonsyndromic (no other recognizable abnormal associated phenotype). The overall impact of hearing impairment is greatly influenced by the severity of hearing defect and by the age of onset. If defect is severe and presents in early childhood, it has dramatic effect on speech acquisition and thereby cognitive and psychosocial development. The mutations shown in the paper results in the conformational changes of protein and influence the phenotype of the affected individuals. For recessive cases of deafness it is possible to reduce the incidence of deafness by carrier screening in the families with multiple affected individuals and genetic counselling. Pendred Syndrome can be characterized by the triad composed of familial goitre, abnormal perchlorate discharge and congenital deafness.

DEAFNESS:

Deafness means hearing impairment. Hearing impairment is classified according to several criterions.

The first criterion is type of ear defect; on the basis of which it may be conductive, sensorineural or mixed depending upon the outer and middle ear, inner ear or both. 

The second criterion is degree of severity of the hearing loss, i.e., mild 27–40 dB loss; moderate 41–55 dB loss; moderate severe 56–70 dB loss; severe 71–90 dB loss and profound > 90 dB loss.

The third criterion is the age of onset and progressiveness of the impairment.

The last criterion for classification of hearing impairment is weather it is associated with other symptoms (syndromic) or weather it is the sole defect (nonsyndromic or isolated)1.

Non-syndromic Deafness:

This is the type of deafness in which there is no other recognizable abnormal phenotype with deafness. It is more common cause of hearing loss than syndromic deafness. It may accounts for 70% of all the genetically determined cases of deafness2. The non-syndromic forms of hearing loss are collectively referred to as DFN for the X-linked forms, DFNA for the autosomal dominant forms and DFNB for autosomal recessive forms.

Non-syndromic Autosomal Recessive Deafness:

Various mapped loci for non-syndromic autosomal recessive hearing loss are symbolized as DFNB1, DFNB2 and so on in the order in which they are first reported or reserved. To date 30 nonsyndromic recessive deafness loci have been mapped and nine defective genes have been identified encoding connexin-26 at DFNB1 locus3, myosin VIIa at DFNB2 locus4, myosin XV at DFNB3 locus5, Pendrin at DFNB4 locus6, otoferlin at DFNB9 locus7, transmembrane serine protease-3 at DFNB10 locus8, cadherin-23 at DFNB12 locus9, a Tectorin at DFNB21 locus10 and Claudin-14 at DFNB29 locus11.

All these loci result in hearing loss and so far no other clinical features are associated with them with the exception of DFNB4, which is associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct6. DFNB2, DFNB4 and DFNB21 gene identification was aided as they had positional candidates because other syndromic or dominant deafness loci had previously mapped to the same chromosomal locations and disease causing genes identified.

Syndromic Deafness:

In syndromic cases of deafness the affected individuals have a specific pattern of additional clinical features, which are not related to audition. It may accounts for 30% of all genetically determined cases. Syndromic deafness can be either dominant (Wardenburg syndrome, Branchial-oto-renal syndrome, Stickler syndrome, recessive (Ushers syndrome, Pendred Syndrome), X-linked (Alport syndrome, Nance syndrome, Hunter syndrome) or mitochondrial. Pendred syndrome is a recessive syndrome in which hearing loss is associated with goitre (Table-1)12.

Environmental Deafness:

Hearing loss can also result from environmental causes. The main contributing environmental factors are meningitis, mumps, perinatal complications, maternofoetal infections (Toxoplasma, Rubella and Cytomegalovirus infections), typhoid, acoustic trauma, ototoxic drugs (aminoglycoside antibiotics) and advancing age (Presbyacusis)13. In a pedigree in which there are individuals with deafness due to genetic causes there may be some individuals who are deaf due to environmental causes.

Prelingual deafness affects approximately 1 in 2000 infants14. Greater than 70% of genetically determined cases are nonsyndromic2. The main pattern of inheritance in severe childhood deafness is autosomal recessive (over 75%) while autosomal dominant (12–24%), X-linked (1–3%) and mitochondrial is also involved15. It has been estimated that 30% of prelingual deafness cases are syndromic14. Syndromic deafness can be either Dominant (Wardenburg syndrome, Branchial-oto-renal syndrome, Stickler syndrome), Recessive (Ushers syndrome, Pendred Syndrome), X-linked (Alport syndrome, Nance syndrome, Hunter syndrome) or Mitochondrial.

Table-1: Autosomal Recessive Syndromic Deafness Loci

Pendred Syndrome

Locus

Location

Gene

PDS

7q21-34

SLC26A4

Usher syndrome

Locus

Location

Gene

USH1A

14q32

Unknown

USH1B

11q13.5

MYO7A

USH1C

11p15.1

USH1C

USH1D

10q

CDH23

USH1E

21q

Unknown

USH1F

10q21-22

PCDH15

USH2A

1q41

USH2A

USH2B

3p23-24.2.

Unknown

USH2C

5q14.3-q21.3

Unknown

USH3

3q21-q25

USH3

     

To date 39 nonsyndromic dominant deafness loci have been mapped to different chromosomes while 13 genes are identified. Also 30 nonsyndromic recessive deafness loci have been mapped to different chromosomal locations while only 9 genes have been identified and protein structure is predicted16.

Overall, recessive deafness tends to be more severe than dominant deafness because it is generally profound, prelingual and fully penetrant whereas dominant deafness is frequently progressive, postlingual and is often observed clinically as the presence of unilateral or mild bilateral deafness17. In case of recessive syndromic deafness Ushers syndrome and Pendred syndrome are most important. Allelic variants at these loci are responsible for both syndromic and nonsyndromic deafness. Some associated symptoms are also variable in onset and penetrance leading to misdiagnosis of syndromic cases as non-syndromic.

Pendred syndrome is one of the most frequent causes of congenital deafness, accounting for about 10% of hereditary hearing loss18-20. It is an autosomal recessive disorder, first described by Vaughan Pendred in 1896 and characterized by congenital sensorineural hearing loss combined with goiter12. Additional abnormalities are an iodide organification defect that can be shown by perchlorate discharge test, an abnormally developed cochlea, i.e., mondini malformation and a widened vestibular aqueduct21. To date 42 different PDS mutations have been identified in people with classic pendred syndrome22-24.

For recessive cases, gene identification studies are hampered due to extreme genetic heterogeneity and limited clinical differentiation25. Mutations in different genes can cause the same clinical phenotype in hearing impaired individuals, even within the same family. On the other hand extreme phenotypic variation between different families (or even in the individuals in the same family) can be due to mutations in the same gene26.

Although genes responsible for deafness have been isolated and many others localized, the molecular genetics of deafness is still in its infancy. The difficulty in localizing deafness genes arises principally from extreme genetic heterogeneity. Heterogeneity seriously hinders linkage analysis because linkage data from different families cannot be reliably pooled. Consequently, the successful chromosomal localization of genes requires large consanguineous families showing clear segregation of deafness locus. In such studies Pakistan can play an important role because of traditional consanguineous marriages27. These marriages provide excellent resource materials for conventional linkage analysis, identifying additional deafness loci and genes that modify deafness phenotypes.

In consanguineous marriages, the proportion of shared genes decreases with the degree of consanguinity but the risk of offspring having autosomal recessive deafness increases because both parents are carrier of the same deleterious gene. For recessive cases of deafness it is possible to reduce the incidence by increasing awareness about the effects of cousin marriages. The carrier screening within the families having multiple affected individuals seems to be important as it can identify persons who are at a high risk. For obtaining this objective, the need is to molecularly characterize deafness and identify genes and mutations contributing to the hearing loss in the concerned country.

LINKAGE ANALYSIS:

Genetic Linkage analysis is a statistical technique used to map genes to find the approximate location of disease gene. Linkage analysis is a relationship between the loci and two loci on the same chromosome are said to be linked if the phenomenon of crossing over does not separate them.

The term linkage refers to the loci, not to specific alleles at these loci. The most common application of linkage analysis is to try and find the location, in the genome, of a gene responsible for a certain mendelianly-inherited disease28.

Alleles at loci on same chromosome should co-segregate at a rate that is somehow related to the distance between them on the chromosome. This rate is the probability or recombination fraction (θ), of a recombination event occurring between two loci. Two loci are said to be genetically linked when recombination fraction is less than 0.5. One of these loci is the disease locus while the other is a polymorphic marker like micro satellite repeats29. The objective of linkage analysis is to estimate recombination fraction and to test if θ is less than 0.5 between two loci i.e. weather an observed deviation from 50% recombination is statistically significant. The recombination fraction ranges from θ= 0 for loci right next to each other through θ= 0.5 for loci apart (or on different chromosomes), so that it can be taken as a measure of the genetic distance or map distance between gene loci. This measure works well for small distances. The unit of measurement is 1 map unit= 1 centimorgan (cM), correspondingly approximately to a recombination fraction of 1%. However, because of the occurrence of multiple crossovers, the recombination fraction is not an additive distance measure and must therefore be transformed by a map function in to map distance28.

Recombinants in the pedigrees have to be analyzed to observe the presence or absence of linkage between two loci. It is not usually possible to count these for human pedigrees. For this reason likelihood methods are used which calculate the likelihood of a given pedigree under different assumptions about the recombination fraction between two loci29. In these calculations, recombination and non-recombination for each possible genotype are calculated. Computers are utilized for this, as the involved calculations are quite complex. A logarithmic ratio is calculated (LOD-likelihood of Odds) denoted by Z. LOD score is logarithmic of odds that the loci are linked with recombination fraction θ rather than unlinked (θ=0.5). A score of +3 or a positive score is an indication of linkage while a score of –2 or a negative score denotes absence of linkage.

For linkage analysis it is necessary to have polymorphic markers which can be checked for inheritance with the disease locus in question. Micro satellite repeats, particularly dinucleotide and tetranucleotide repeats are very important in this aspect, as they are highly polymorphic and abundant in the genome. CA/TG repeats are most common accounting for 0.5% of the genome29.

Pendred Syndrome:

About a century back in 1896 Vaughean Pendred described the association of congenital deafness with goitre12. Pendred syndrome has usually been described as a triad composed of familial goitre, abnormal perchlorate discharge and a congenital deafness30. Deficiency of thyroxin synthesis occurs, Thyroid stimulating hormone increases, and the thyroid gland enlargement is seen31. In a normal thyroid, iodide ions are actively transported in to the cells and covalently linked to thyroglobulin after oxidation in the presence of thyroid peroxidase enzyme32. The thyroid dysfunction is biochemically characterized by inability to organify iodine21. The abnormality in thyroid handling of iodide forms the basis of the negative perchlorate test. A deficiency of thyroxin synthesis leads to an increase in the thyroid stimulating hormone and eventually enlargement of thyroid gland known as goiter33. Another clinical feature is the structural abnormality of the hearing organ in the patients of Pendred syndrome. Mondini dysplasia of the inner ear has been determined in 50% of patients with Pendred syndrome that involves defects in the bony and membranous labyrinth, organ of corti and stria vascularis33. The original description of the mondini deformity was based on an autopsy examination of an eight-year-old deaf child34. Since then, numerous histological studies have been carried out on temporal bones demonstrating mondini type changes often in association with various other malformations35-37.

In 1980, Schnuknecht et al37 carried out histological studies in patients of Pendred syndrome and found bony cochlear changes consistent with many mondini malformation. Classical mondini inner ear deformity includes a reduce number of turns of cochlea, enlarged vestibule, abnormal semicircular canal and enlarged vestibular aqueduct37. Phelps et al (1998) have shown by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that the deficiency of intersaccular septum in the distal coil of cochlea is not a constant feature of Pendred syndrome, whereas the enlargement of endolymphatic sac and duct in association with large vestibular aqueduct is very consistent among all the patients examined by MRI32.

Sheffield et al (1996) mapped Pendred syndrome to chromosome 7 to 9cM interval flanked by the markers GATA23f5 and D7S68721. Everett et al (1997) identified the Pendred gene as organized in twenty one exons and encodes a predicted 780 amino acids transmembrane protein known as pendrin22. Based on the homology of PDS to sulphate transporter genes it was thought that Pendrin is involved in sulphate transport22. However Scott et al (1999) reported that Pendrin is not capable of transporting sulphate but acts as a transporter of chloride iodide38. Using Xenopus laevis oocytes and XF9 insects cells, as two separate expression systems, they demonstrated that Pendrin can transport iodide and chloride but not sulphate. Further Pendrin is expressed in thyroid, Kidney and foetal cochlea. Recent studies have shown that pendrin is functionally similar to renal chloride/formate exchanger, which serves as an important mechanism of chloride transport in the proximal tubule39. Thus a defect in the chloride transport properties of Pendrin in the inner ear could contribute to hearing loss associated with Pendred Syndrome. Royaux et al (2000) have shown that Pendrin is protected in a limited subset of cells within the thyroid follicles exclusively at the apical membrane of the follicular epithelium and therefore suggested that Pendrin (Figure-1) is an apical porter of iodide in the thyroid and the function of both apical and basal iodide portes are co-ordinately regulated by follicular TG (Ftrl-5 cells) 40.

 

Figure-1: Structure of pendrin with 11 transmembrane domains, 6 intracellular and 6 extracellular loops.

Mutations of PDS:

Pendred syndrome is one of the most frequent causes of congenital deafness, accounting for about 10% of hereditary hearing loss. To date more than 42 different PDS mutations have been identified in people with classic Pendred syndrome (Table-2)19,21-24. Two reports of non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNB4) derived PDS mutations in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss have been described6,41.

Table-2: Different Mutations in SLC26A4 gene

Nucleotide substitutions

S. No.

Codon

Nucleotide

1

138

aGTT-TTT

2

139

GGA-GCA

3

193

ACT-ATT

4

209

GGA-GTA

5

236

CTA-CCA

6

271

tGAT-CAT

7

369

aAAA-GAA

8

372

GCC-GTC

9

384

GAA-GGA

10

409

CGC-CAC

11

410

ACG-ATG

12

416

cACT-CCT

13

445

TTG-TGG

14

480

GTT-GAT

15

490

cATC-CTC

16

497

cGGT-AGT

17

508

ACT-AAT

18

530

cTAC-CAC

19

556

TAT-TGT

20

565

TGT-TAT

21

653

GTG-GCG

22

667

TTC-TGC

23

672

GGA-GAA

24

721

ACG-ATG

25

723

CAT-CGT

Small insertions

S. No.

Nucleotide

Codon

Insertion

1

336

112

T

2

1334

445

AGTC

3

 

704

GCTGG

4

2182

728

G

Small deletions

S. No.

Codon

Deletion

1

250

ATGGA^GTTCTctctATTATCTAT_E6I6_G

2

305

GAAGTA^ATTGtG_E7I7_GTAAGTAGA

3

382

CGATGGG^AACcAG_E9I9_GTATGGGT

4

398

GATTC^TTCTCtTGTTTTGTGG

5

427

TCATC^TCTGCtgcGATTGTGATG

6

447

CTTGCAG^AAG_E11I11_gTATAACCCTG

7

511

TGGTC^CTGAGagTTCAGTT_E13I13_GTG

8

632

CAACC^AAGGAaATAGAGATTC

9

708

TGCGGG^TTCTtTGACGACAAC

Nucleotide Substitutions/splicing

S. No.

Relative Location

Substitution

1

+7

A-G

2

-2

A-G

3

+1

G-A

4

+1

G-A

Summary of the mutations listed

Mutation type

Total number

of mutations

Nucleotide substitutions

25

Nucleotide substitutions (splicing)

4

Small deletions

9

Small insertions

4

Total

42

                 

DFNB4:

DFNB4 locus was localized in a south west Indian family on chromosome 7q31 within 14cM interval flanked by the markers D7S501 and D7S530. The linkage region was already the PDS gene known to cause Pendred syndrome. When the PDS gene was examined for sequence analysis, two single base changes in the exon 13 of the coding region were found.

There was G®A transition at nucleotide position 1713, resulting in a predicted Glycine to Serine substitution at 497 (G497S). The second mutation was an A®C transversion at nucleotide position 1692, which results in a predicted Isolucine to Lucine substitution at position 490 (I490L). This family did not contain the characteristic features of the Pendred syndrome, i.e., there was no goitre in the affected individuals. The results suggested that the same gene PDS can be responsible both for syndromic and non syndromic deafness6.

Functional difference of the PDS gene in Syndromic and Nonsyndromic Hearing loss:

Recent studies by Scott et al (2000) have shown that PDS mutations in individuals with Pendred syndrome differ functionally from PDS mutations in individuals with non syndromic hearing loss39. They compared the three common Pendred syndrome allele variants (L236P, T416P and E384G) with three PDS mutations reported only in individuals with nonsyndromic hearing loss (V480D, V653A and I490L/G497S). They found that mutations associated with Pendred syndrome have a complete loss of pendrin induced chloride and iodide transport, while alleles unique to people with DFNB4 are able to transport both iodide and chloride, although at much lower level than a wild type pendrin. It is proposed that the residual level of anion transport is sufficient to eliminate the onset of goitre in individuals with DFNB439.

REFERENCES

1.        Kalatzis V, Pettit C. The fundamental medical impacts of recent progress in research on hereditary hearing loss. Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:1589-97.

2.        Bergstrom L, Hemenway WG, Downs MP. A high risk registry to find congenital deafness. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 1971;4:369-99.

3.        Kelsell DP, Dunlop J, Stevens HP, Lench NJ, Liang JN, Parry G, et al. Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature 1997;387:80-3.

4.        Liu XZ, Walsh J, Mburu P, Kendrick-Jones J, Cope MJTV, Steel KP, et al. Mutations in the myosin VIIA gene cause non- syndromic recessive deafness. Nat Genet 1997;16:188-90.

5.        Wang A, Liang Y, Fridell RA, Probst FJ, Wilcox ER, Touchman JW, et al. Association of unconventional myosin MY015 mutations with human nonsyndromic clearness DFNB3. Science 1998;280:1447-51.

6.        Li XC, Everett LA, Lalwani AK, Desmukh D, Friedman TB, Green ED, et al. A mutation in PDS causes non-syndromic recessive deafness. Nat Genet 1998;18:215-7.

7.        Chaib H, Place C, Salem N, Dode C, Chardenoux S, Weissenbach J, et al. Mapping of DFNB12, a gene for a non- syndromal autosomal recessive deafness, to chromosome 10q21-22. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5:1061-4.

8.        BonneTamir B, De Stefano AL, Briggs CE, Adair R, Franklyn B, Weiss S, et al. Linkage of congenital recessive deafness (gene DFNB10) to chromosome 21q22.3. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:1254-9.

9.        Chaib H, Place C, Salem N, Chardenoux S, Vincent C, Weissenbach J, et al. A gene responsible for a sensorineural nonsyndromic recessive deafness maps to chromosome 2p22-23. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5:155-8.

10.     Mustapha M, Weil D, Chardenoux S, Elias S, El-Zir E, Beckmann JS, et al. An alpha-tectorin gene defect causes a newly identified autosomal recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness, DFNB21. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:409-12.

11.     Wilcox ER, Burton QL, Naz S, Riazuddin S, Smith TN, Ploplis B, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding tight junction claudin-14 cause autosomal recessive deafness DFNB29. Cell 2001;12 (1):104-65.

12.     Pendred V. Deaf-mutism and goitre. Lancet 1896;11:532.

13.     Chen H and Green WH. Medical Genetics Handbook. 2nd ed. (USA): Raven Publishers; 1988

14.     Newton CR, Graham A, Heptinstall LE, Powell SJ, Summers C, Kalsheker N, et al. Analysis of any point mutation in DNA: the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Nucl Acids Res 1989;17:2503-16.

15.     Marazita ML, Ploughman LM, Rawlings B, Remington E, Arnos KS, Nance WE. Genetic Epidemiological studies of early onset deafness in US School-age population. Am J Med Genet 1993;46:486-91.

16.     Van Camp G and Smith RJH. Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage.  http://dnalab-www.uia.ac.be/dnalab/hhh.

17.     Fraser GR. The Causes of Profound Deafness in Childhood. 1st ed. (USA): Johns Hopkins Univ. Press;1976.

18.     Reardon W, Coffey R, Chowdhury T, Grossman A, Jan H, Button K, et al. Prevalence, age of onset, and natural history of thyroid disease in Pendred syndrome. J Med Genet 1997;36:595-8.

19.     Coyle B, Reardon W, Herbrick JA, Tsui LC, Gausden E, Lee J, et al. Molecular analysis of the PDS gene in Pendred syndrome (sensorineural hearing loss and goitre). Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:1105-12.

20.     Cremers CWRJ, Bolder C, Admiraal RJC, Everett LA, Joosten FBM, Van Hauwe P, et al. Progressive sensorineural hearing loss and a widened vestibular aqueduct in Pendred syndrome. Arch Otolaryng Head Neck Surg 1998;124:501-5.

21.     Sheffield VC, Kraiem Z, Beck JC, Nishimura D, Stone EM, Salameh M, et al. Pendred syndrome maps to chromosome 7q21-34 and is caused by an intrinsic defect in thyroid iodine organification. Nat Genet 1996;12:424-6.

22.     Everett LA, Glaser B, Beck JC, Idol JR, Buchs A, Heyman M, et al. Pendred syndrome is caused by mutations in a putative sulphate transporter gene (PDS). Nat Genet 1997;17:411-22.

23.     Van Hauwe P, Everett LA, Coucke P, Scott DA, Kraft ML, Ris-Stalpers C, et al. Two frequent missense mutations in Pendred syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:1099-104.

24.     Bogazzi F, Raggi F, Ultimieri F, Campomori A, Cosci C, Berrettini S, et al. A novel mutation in the pendrin gene associated with Pendred's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 2000;52:279-85.

25.     Petit C. Genes responsible for Human Hereditary Deafness: symphony of a thousand. Nat Genet 1996;14:385-91.

26.     Masmoudi S, Charfedine I, Hmani M, Grati M, Ghorbel AM, Elgaeid-Boulila A, et al. Pendred Syndrome: Phenotypic variability in two families carrying the same PDS missense mutation. Am J Med Genet 2000;90:38-44.

27.     Shami SA, Schmitt LH, Bittles AH. Consanguinity related prenatal and postnatal mortality of the population of seven Pakistani Punjab cities. J Med Genet 1989;26:267-71.

28.     Ott J. Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage. 1st ed. (USA): Johns Hopkins University Press;1985

29.     Terwillger JD, and Ott J. Hand Book of human genetic linkage. 2nd ed. (USA): John Hopkins University Press;1994.

30.     Cave WT, and Dunn JT. Studies on thyroidal defect in an atypical form of Pendred Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1973;41:590-9.

31.     Batsakis JG, and Nishiyama RH. Deafness with sporadic goitre: Pendred's syndrome. Arch Otolaryng 1962;76:401-6.

32.     Phelps PD, Coffey RA, Trembath RC, Luxon LM, Grossman AB, Britton KE, et al. Radiological malformations of the ear in Pendred Syndrome. Clin Radiol 1998;53:268-73.

33.     Kabakkaya Y, Bakan E, Yigitoglus MR, Goke G, Dogan M. Pendred Syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:285-8.

34.     Mondini C. Anatoma surdi nedi sectro DeBononiensi Scientiarum et Artium. Instituto Anque Academic Commentarie 1791;7:28-9.

35.     Parpella MM, el-Fiky FM. Mondini’s deafness. Arch Otolaryngol 1972;95:134-40.

36.     Parpella MM. Mondini’s deafness: A review of histopathology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1980;89:1-10.

37.     Schuknecht HF. Mondini’s dysplasia; A Clinical and Pathological study. An Otol Rhinaol Laryngol Suppl 1980;89:1-23.

38.     Scott DA, Wang R, Kreman TM, Sheffield VC, Karniski LP. The Pendred syndrome gene encodes a chloride-iodide transport protein. Nat Genet 1999;21:440-3.

39.     Scott D, Karaniski LP. Human Pendrin expressed in Xenopus laevis oocyte mediates chloride/formate exchange. Am J Physiol 2000;278:C207-11.

40.     Royaux IE, Suzuki K, Mori A, Katoh R, Everett LA, Kohn LD, et al. Pendrin, The protein encoded by the Pendred Syndrome gene (PDS), is an apical porter of iodide in the thyroid and is regulated by thyroglobulin in FTRL-5 cells. Endocrinology 2000;141:839-45.

41.     Usami S, Abe S, Weston MD, Shinkawa H, Van Camp G, Kimberling WJ. Non-syndromic hearing loss associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct is caused by PDS mutations. Hum Genet 1999;104:188-92.

Address for Correspondence:

Dr. Ahmed Bilal Waqar, Molecular Biology Division, Department of Pathology, Foundation University Medical College, Rawalpindi. Tele: +92 51 4443191, +92 303 7766509

E-mail:   ahmedbilal73@yahoo.com, abilal73@isd.wol.net.pk