RELATION OF BODY MASS INDEX WITH LIPID
PROFILE AND BLOOD PRESSURE IN YOUNG HEALTHY STUDENTS AT ZIAUDDIN MEDICAL
UNIVERSITY
Jawed Aziz, Nadeem
A Siddiqui*, Imran A Siddiqui**, Amir Omair***
Departments of Pathology, *Medicine, **Biochemistry and ***Community
Health Sciences,
INTRODUCTION
Ischemic heart disease is the
major cause of death in developed countries as well as in developing countries.
Several studies have been conducted on Pakistani population, which prove that
the mortality due to IHD in
Lipids and
lipoproteins are well known risk factors for ischemic heart disease. Elevated
levels of triglyceride, cholesterol and LDL-C are documented as risk factors
for atherogenesis.7 LDL-C in its oxidized or acetylated form has
been identified as a major atherogenic particle, as
it not only load macrophages with cholesterol for the formation of foam cells
but also because it is chemotactic for circulating monocytes, is cytotoxic and can
adversely alter coagulation pathways.8-10 The blood level of HDL-C
in contrast bears an inverse relationship of the risk of atherosclerosis and
coronary heart disease that is higher the level, smaller the risk.11-12
Different plasma
lipids vary significantly in various population groups due to difference in
geographical, cultural13, economical, social conditions14,
dietary habits and genetic makeup. Age and gender differences also affect serum
lipids considerably.15-17 This study was conducted to assess serum
lipids and blood pressure among the three BMI groups (underweight, normal and
overweight) in healthy young males and females belonging to middle and higher
socioeconomic group, admitted in a private medical college from 1996 to 2001.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Four hundred and twenty six (152
male, 274) students between 17-22 years of age admitted in the first year
program of a private medical university were included in this study. Their
height, weight and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were recorded. Body
Mass Index (BMI) was calculated by using their height (m2) and
weight (kg). On the basis of BMI, all students were divided into three groups
that is under weight whose BMI was less than 19 kg / m2, normal whose BMI was between 19 and 26 kg / m2 and
overweight whose BMI was more than 26 kg / m2.
After twelve
hours fast, serum samples were collected and total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C
and triglycerides were estimated on photometer 5010 and 911-Hitachi autoanalyzer. Statistical analysis was done on Epi-Info-6.
The means of the three groups were compared by ANOVA at the significance level
of a
= 0.05. correlation coefficient was determined for the
dependent variables of lipid profile and blood pressure with BMI (in kg/m2)
as the independent variable.
RESULTS
The
height and weight were available for 351 students and of 426 serum cholesterol
was estimated in all students included in the study while, serum LDL-C, HDL-C
and triglycerides was estimated in 371 students due to insufficient volume or
turbidity of serum. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was recorded in
347 students. There were 301 students in whom all parameter were available and
they were selected for analysis in this study. Mean serum cholesterol
Table-1: Cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C,
triglycerides, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure according
to three BMI groups (Means ±SD)
Variables |
Under weight (BMI<19kg/m2) |
(BMI19-26kg/m2) |
Overweight (BMI>26kg/m2) |
p-value* |
Cholesterol (mg/dl) |
145.2 ±30.4 |
149.7 ±31.7 |
155.5 ±31.3 |
0.23 |
LDL-C (mg/dl) |
87.3 ±29.2 |
92.2 ±22.6 |
95.4 ±27.5 |
0.26 |
HDL-C (mg/dl) |
41.9 ±9.3 |
39.7 ±9.1 |
37.7 ±6.9 |
0.04 |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
80.2 ±28.6 |
89.2 ±41.6 |
112.2 ±58.0 |
0.001 |
SBP (mmHg) |
108.6 ±14.0 |
113.6 ±11.8 |
120.1 ±16.5 |
<0.001 |
DBP (mmHg) |
71.7 ±8.3 |
74.5 ±7.9 |
76.0 ±7.8 |
0.01 |
*p-value calculated by ANOVA comparing the means of the variables for the three BMI groups
in 301
students was 149.3 mg/dl ±31.3, mean LDL-C was 91.3 mg/dl ±27.7, mean HDL-C was
40.0 mg/dl ±42.2 and mean triglycerides were 89.9 mg/dl ±42.2. Mean systolic
blood pressure was 113.1 mmHg ±13.5 and mean diastolic blood pressure was 74.0
mmHg ±8.1. Though the total number of observations for all parameters was
ranging between 347 to 425 but their means were not
significantly different from the means of those 301 students whose all
parameters were available.
The mean BMI of
students was 21.6 kg/m2 ±4.2. Among 301 students, 88 were
underweight that is their BMI was less than 19 kg/m2, 175 were
normal that is their BMI was between 19 kg/m2 and 26 kg/m2 and
38 were overweight that is their BMI was more than 26Kg/m2. Mean
values of serum cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, systolic and
diastolic blood pressure with their standard deviations according to three BMI
groups are given in table-1. There were significant differences in mean serum
HDL-C, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic blood pressure among three BMI
groups (P<0.05) but none in mean serum cholesterol and LDL-C. No significant
correlation was found between any of the lipid profile variables and blood
pressure variables with BMI.
DISCUSSION
There are few studies
conducted in subjects whose age ranges between 20-30 years but they belong to
lower socio-economic background, showed higher mean values of serum total
cholesterol, LDL-C and triglycerides while, mean serum HDL-C was low .15
Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was in
agreement with other studies.16-18
In
this study, comparison of three BMI groups (underweight, normal and overweight)
with regards to serum total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, mean
systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also examined. Beaver County Lipid
Study showed positive and significant association between BMI and triglycerides.19
Similarly, the Minneapolis Children’s Blood Pressure Study also showed same
results.17 Findings of our study are consistent with the previous
studies as we also found no significant difference (P > 0.05) in serum total
cholesterol and LDL-C but there is significant difference (p< 0.05) in mean
serum HDL-C, triglycerides, mean systolic and mean diastolic blood pressure in
three BMI groups. These findings can be explained by the results of certain
studies that showed that hyperinsulinemia and insulin
resistance are strongly correlated with obesity.20-23
It
has been estimated that risk of myocardial infarction is 35% to 55% less in
adults and normal weight as compared to obese adults.24 However, the
influence of obesity on cardiovascular risk begins before adulthood and
overweight during adolescence is associated with an increased risk of coronary
heart disease in male and female subjects.25 As 12.6% students of
our total study population are overweight, so number of at-risk individuals is
much higher. Therefore, strategies designed to limit cardiovascular risk should
address weight reduction during childhood and adolescence.
REFERENCES
1.
Hashmi JA. An epidemiological study of heart disease in
2.
Nisar F, Din S, Jabeen M. Serum
cholesterol of children of various socio-economic groups. Pak J Med Res 1985; 15: 117-21.
3.
Gordon T. Coronary
heart disease in young women: Incidence and Epidemiology. In Oliver MF, ed.
Coronary heart disease in young women.
4.
Kannel WB. A general cardiovascular risk profile. The
5.
Stamler J, Epstein FH. Coronary heart disease risk factors as
guide to preventive action. Prev Med 1972; 1: 27-30.
6.
Epstein FH. The
Tecumseh study: Design, progress and prospects. Arch Environ Health 1970;21:402-6.
7.
Lipid Research
Clinic Program. The lipid research clinic coronary primary prevention trial
results II. J Am Med Assoc 1984; 251: 364-74.
8.
Fogelman A, Schechter I, Seager J. Malondialdehyde alteration of low density lipoproteins
leads to cholesteryl ester accumulation in human monocyte-macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci
9.
Palinski W, Rosenfeld M, Yla-Herttuala
S. Low density lipoprotein undergoes oxidative modification in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci
10.
Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Role of oxidized low density lipoproteinin atherogenesis. J Clin Invest 1991;88:1785-92.
11.
Khoo KL, Tan H, Leiw YM. Serum
lipids and their relationship with other coronary risk factors in healthy
subjects in a city clinic. Med J
12.
Tao S, Li Y, Xiao
Z, Cen R, Zhang H, Zhuo B,
Chen P, Li Y, Liao Y. Serum lipids and their
correlates in Chinese urban and rural population of Beijing and Guangzhou.
PRC-USA Cardiovascular and Cardiopulmonary Epidemiology Research Group. J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 893-903.
13. Hart C, Ecob R, Smith GD.
People, places and coronary heart disease risk factors: a multilevel analysis
of the Scottish Heart Health Study archive. Soc Sci
Med 1997; 45: 893-902.
14. Vartiainen E, Pekkanen J, Koskinen S, Jousilahti P, Salomma V, Puska P. Do changes in
cardiovascular risk factors explain the increasing socioeconomic difference in
mortality from ischaemic heart disease in
15. Shahid A, Zuberi SJ, Hasnain N. Lipid pattern in healthy subjects. Pak J Med Res 1985; 24: 33-7.
16. Malik R, Pirzado ZA, Ahmed S, Sajid M. Study of lipid profile, blood pressure and blood
glucose in rural population. Pak J Med Res 1995; 34:
152-5.
17. Prineas RJ, Gillum RF, Horibe H, Hannan PJ, Stat. The
Minneapolis Children’s Blood Pressure Study: standards of measurement for
children’s blood pressure. Hypertention 1980;2(suppl I): S18-24.
18. Sinaiko AR, Donahue RP, Jacobs DR, Prineas
RJ. Relation of weight and rate of increase in weight during childhood and
adolescence to body size, blood pressure, fasting insulin and lipids in young
adults. Circulation 1999; 99: 1471-6.
19. Donahue RP, Orchard TJ, Kuller
LH, Drash AL, Lipids and lipoproteins in young adult
population. Am J Epidemiol 1985;240:458-67.
20. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E. Insulin
resistance: a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension,
dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular
disease. Diabetes Care 1991;14:173–94.
21. Lind L, Lithell H, Pollare T. Is it hyperinsulinemia
or insulin resistance that is related to hypertension and other metabolic
cardiovascular risk factors? J Hypertens 1993; 11(suppl 4):
S11–6.
22. Morris AD, Petrie JR, Connell JMC. Insulin and
hypertension. J Hypertens 1994; 12: 633–42.
23. Godsland IF, Stevenson JC. Insulin resistance: syndrome or
tendency? Lancet 1995; 346: 100–03.
24. Manson JE, Tosteson H, Ridker PM, Satterfield S, Hebert P, O'Connor GT, et al. The
primary prevention of myocardial infarction. N Engl J
Med 1992;326:1406–16.
25. DiPietro L, Mossberg HO, Stunkard AJ.
A 40 year history of overweight children in
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Address for
Correspondence:
Dr. Imran A Siddiqui, Department
of Biochemistry,