OUTCOME
OF RUBBER BAND LIGATION OF HAEMORRHOIDS
USING
SUCTION LIGATOR
Tanwir Khaliq, S.Aslam Shah, Ansar Mehboob
Department of General
Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences,
Background: Haemorrhoids are a common surgical problem seen in the
outpatient department. Rubber band ligation using
suction is an effective treatment for symptomatic haemorrhoids
but associated with significant morbidity.This
prospective observational study was carried out to assess the efficacy,
effectiveness and complications of rubber band ligation
performed in outpatient for symptomatic haemorhoids
using suction ligator. The results and outcome of
procedure performed by the consultants
and senior residents were also compared. Methods: 56 consecutive
patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids underwent
rubber band ligation in the outpatient clinic of the
department of general surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences. Outcome
measures were symptomatic cure i.e. stoppage of bleeding and reduced mucosal prolapse.
Complications were categorized as immediate, early (within one week) and
late (within 3 months). Results: Symptomatic cure was achieved in
50(89.20%) patients (stoppage of bleeding and reduced mucosal prolapse). Six (10.72%) patients required further banding.
Pain (mild to severe) was most common immediate and intermediate complication
(14 and 20 patient’s respectively). Conclusion: Rubber band ligation is an effective, outdoor procedure for symptomatic
haemorrhoids, but associated with certain degree of
morbidity.
Keywords: Hemorrhoids, Suction Ligator,
Banding.
INTRODUCTION
Hemorrhoids are among the
commonest surgical ailments of anorectal region seen
in the outpatient department1. These are usually associated with distressing
symptoms. The incidence of hemorrhoids increases with age. At least 50% of
patients over the age of 50 years have some degree of discomfort from them.
Shyness and fear are the main reasons of avoiding medical treatment2.
Treatment of hemorrhoids has remained controversial among surgeons all over the
world. For the last many decades’ surgeons have treatment, which would give
good results with minimum complications3.
Most patients in
initial stages are treated with conservative or minimally invasive approaches.
Injection sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation(RBL) are two common non-surgical interventional
procedures to treat first (1st) and second (2nd) degree haemorrhoids. These procedures can be performed in the
outpatient clinics, with minimum resources and are cost effective. Rubber band ligation has been shown to be superior to the injection sclerotherapy; however it is also associated with certain
complications. Introduction of suction ligator has
almost completely replaced the conventional Barron’s apparatus. In this article
we will present the outcome of rubber band ligation
using suction ligator in patient who presented or
were referred for the treatment of haemorrhoids in
the out patient surgical department of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences,
This study was conducted at the department of General Surgery, Pakistan
Institute of Medical Sciences,
After complete history and
examination (both digital rectal examination and proctoscopy)
diagnosis and degree of haemorrhoids was confirmed.
Rigid sigmoidoscopy was performed in selected cases.
The indications for sigmoidoscopy were other symptoms
like change in bowel habit, diarrhea and haematochezia
and to rule out any malignant pathology
in the distal colon. All patients were explained about the procedure and its
complications and other treatment options available. An informed consent was
obtained. Suction band ligation was done in OPD, and
it was done both by consultants and senior surgical resident.
Patient was placed
in left lateral position. Routine rectal examination and proctoscopy
was performed to ascertain the degree of haemorrhoids.
The base of hemorrhoids was clearly identified and bands were applied above the
dentate line using suction band ligator (Kilroid® Meditech)
(Figure-1). Two hemorrhoids were banded at single sitting. Repeat banding was
done after 4 weeks when needed.
The patients were asked to
report any pain on applying suction. If they had any pain, suction was released
and a higher spot was chosen and bands were applied only when patient had no
complaints of pain. Following the procedure, patients were asked to rate the
discomfort / pain on a scale of 1-10. The pain was graded as mild (1-3),
moderate (4-6) and severe (7-10). The patients were observed for immediate
complications for 30 minutes and were followed up for intermediate
complications (within 1 weeks) and late (within 2 months) in the OPD.
Data was analyzed
by using SPSS version 10 and p-value was calculated using chi square
test.
RESULTS
In our study there were 56 patients out of which 48 (85.6%) were male
and 8 (14.3%) were female. All the patients had the symptoms of bleeding per
rectum while 29 (51.7%) patients had complaints of prolapse
and 23 (41%) had complaints of itching / pruritus ani and 16 (28.2%) had complaints of discharge per
rectally. Total 127 bands were applied (two per single sitting) and repeat
banding was done in 6 (10.7%) cases. Out of 56 patients 33 (58.9%) cases were
done by the consultants while the senior residents did 23 cases. The
comparative outcome and complications are given in the tables 2 and 3.
Twenty-four (42.8%)
patients had immediate complications (Table 2) while 27 (48.21%) patients
experienced intermediate complications (Table 3). There were no late and
serious complications like sepsis, massive bleeding necrosis, ulceration and stenosis. There was no mortality. After two months follow
up 50 (89.3%) patients had symptomatic cure and six patients had complaints of
bleeding. On proctoscopy there were complete recovery
in 41 (73.21%) cases, 9 (16.07%) had residual bulge, 3 (5.3%) had complete one
pile left and (5.3%) had two complete piles left. (Table 4).
Degree |
Number of Cases |
Percentage
|
1st (1o) |
11 |
19.64 % |
2nd (11o) |
41 |
73.22 % |
3rd (111o) |
04 |
07.14 % |
Problem |
Consultant
|
Resident |
Total |
P-Value |
Mild
Pain |
3(5.3%) |
4(7.2%) |
7 (12.5%)* |
|
Moderate
Pain |
3(5.3%) |
1(1.78 %) |
4(7.2%) |
P<0.05 |
Severe
Pain |
2(3.5%) |
3(5.3%) |
5(8.9%)* |
|
Vasovagal
episode |
1(1.7%) |
3(5.3%) |
4(7.2%) |
P<0.05 |
Bleeding |
2(3.5%) |
2(3.5%) |
4(7.2%)* |
|
Total |
11(19.64 %) |
13 (23.21 %) |
42 (42.8 %) |
|
* Statistically not
significant
Complication |
Consultant
|
Resident |
Total |
P-Value |
Discomfort/mild
Pain |
6(10.71 %) |
7 (12.5 %) |
13 (23.21 %) |
P<0.05 |
Moderate
Pain |
4(7.14 %) |
3 (5.3 %) |
7(12.5 %)* |
|
Severe
Pain |
2(3.5%) |
1 (1.78 %) |
3(5.3 %)* |
|
Fever
with Rigors |
1(1.78 %) |
1(1.78 %) |
2 (3.78 %)* |
|
Burning Micturation |
0 |
1(1.78 %) |
1(1.78 %) |
P<0.05 |
Slippage of Band |
0 |
1(1.78 %) |
1(1.78 %) |
P<0.05 |
Total |
13(23.21 %) |
14 (25 %) |
27 (48.21 %) |
|
* Statistically not
significant
DISCUSSION
Various techniques have been
instituted for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Ligation
and excision is the conventional treatment for prolapsing
hemorrhoids. This procedure can be an unpleasant experience for some patients.
Complications such as per-operative and post-operative hemorrhage, urinary
retention, post-operative pain and anal stenosis are
well documented. To avoid these complications various alternatives such as sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation
(RBL) and variety of other techniques requiring costly equipment include
cryosurgery, photocoagulation, laser surgery, radio frequency coagulation and
direct current coagulation, infra red coagulations and bipolar diathermy have
been devised. However, these procedures are also not devoid of complications 1,4,6,7.
Surgical procedures
include manual dilation of anus, internal sphincterotomy
and various modifications in techniques of hemorrhoidectomy.8-14
In the recent past
there has been a strong trend in favour of day care
surgery for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. Lord’s procedure of maximum
anal dilatation, introduced in 1968, is the most controversial of the newer
methods of treating hemorrhoids 15,16.
Parameter |
No
of Cases |
Symptoms |
|
No bleeding
|
50(89.28
%) |
Some bleeding
|
6
(10.62 %) |
Signs
(Proctoscopy) |
|
Complete Recovery
|
41
(73.21 %) |
Residual Bulge
|
09
(16.07 %) |
Complete one pile left
|
03
(03.35 %) |
Complete two pile left
|
03
(03.35 %) |
Fig-1: Suction band ligator
(Kilroid® Meditech)
Rubber Band Ligation was introduced by Blaisdell
in 1958 and refined by Barron in 1963. The cost effectiveness, safety, ease of treatment
for both patients and doctor combined with good clinical results has increased
the popularity of RBL 17.
RBL using suction
is a recent modification. It is performed by a simple disposable plastic
apparatus which has both band applicator and suction device in one instrument,
the haemmorhoidal mass is sucked and band is applied.
It is best suited
to the most of second –degree hemorrhoids and patient friendly procedure even
for pregnant, elderly and those unfit for surgery. RBL should be attempted only
on second degree or early third degree hemorrhoids. Since with first degree,
especially in early cases, there is insufficient tissue available to pull in to
the ligature drum to make the method worthwhile, and in any event such small
piles can be as effectively managed by injection sclerotherapy.
Two or three haemorrhoids dealt with at the same
session. Over 90% of symptomatic haemorrhoids can be
treated conservatively or with RBL. The main criticism of RBL is that it does
nothing to remove the skin-covered component of the pile or an associated skin
covered component of the pile or an associated skin tag. The bothering skin
tags may be removed under local anesthesia as an out door procedure later on18.
Secondary
hemorrhage which may be life threatening is another problem which may occur at
home as the patient is treated on out patients’ basis. For the third degree haemorrhoids with large skin covered component, RBL has
very limited and temporary value and is no substitute for surgical treatment.
As far as complications of this method are concerned, delayed massive rectal
bleeding, urinary retention, pain and fever, perianal
abscess& perianal fistula, band related muscosal ulcer and priapism has
been reported in the literature19.
Studies of Murie et al20 and Poen
at al21 have shown RBL as effective as haemorrhoidectomy.The
study also confirms that RBL is an effective treatment for symptomatic haemorrhoids. Kumar et al22 described cure rate
up to 71%, whereas in our study cure has been 89% and the incidence of
immediate and intermediate complications was 67.3% and 74.4 respectively in
their study whereas in our series it was 42.85% and 48.21 % respectively which
as quite less as compared to Kumar et al series. All these patients required
observation for 1 hour and later discharged, no patient was admitted to
in-patient. This is comparable to other international studies 5,8.
There were no late complications. Though very rare, but serious complications,
like bleeding, sepsis and mortality have been reported. Though the incidence of
complications in our series is less but it is significant.
In our study RBL
was performed by both by the consultant and senior surgical residents. The
residents performed this procedure under supervision. There was no
statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications. In a
series of 100 patient’s ninety one percent (91%) patients were symptoms free
after six weeks of treatment19.
In a study carried
out by Murie in 1980 “in which he compared rubber
band ligation and hemorrhoidectomy
for second degree hemorrhoids concluded that rubber band ligation
should be considered as the first line of treatment for second-degree
hemorrhoids20.
Some surgeons have
performed rubber band ligation at only one site at
each outpatient visit while others have applied two bands, and some have band ligation of all three hemorrhoids at single visit.
In a series of 200
patients out-come in 89% of patients with prolapse;
banding was effective in relieving anal pain, pruritus
ani and soiling, which are regarded as secondary
symptoms of the disease17.
There is remarkable individual
variation in the management of hemorrhoids. Day care and less invasive
procedures are more acceptable to the patients.
RBL is an
efficient, safe and acceptable modality. Addition of suction gun to banding
apparatus adds to the convenience of surgeon and the procedure becomes quick
and effective. Selection criteria of patients of RBL have important impact in
the outcome of management of hemorrhoids.The results
of the procedure performed by the consultant or senior resident are same.
REFERENCES
1.
Bhatti AA, Ahmed R, Butt
MA. Comparative study between sclerotherapy and
manual anal dilatation in the management of second-degree hemorrhoids.
2.
Sheikh AR, Ahmed 1.Comparative study of haemorrhoidectomy with rubber band ligation
for second and third degree hemorrhoids Specialist 1995; 12(1): 39-45.
3.
Malik AM, Zafar MR, Abbasi SA. Submucosal
closed and open (ligation Excision) hemorrhoidectomy. Pak Armed Forces Med Jour 1947; 02(6-7):
20-2.
4.
Quraishy MS, Idris F, Sultan N. Out Patient treatment of hemorrhoids
with electronic coagulator-initial experience with 103 patients. Med Spectrum
1999; 02(6-7): 20-2.
5.
Aftab ML. A comparative
analysis of infrared coagulation and injection sclerotherapy
as non-operative treatment for the management of hemorrhoids. Biomedica 1997; 13: 70-2.
6.
Aftab ML. Role of
photocoagulation in the management of non-prolapsing
and early prolapsing hemorrhoids. Annals 1999; 5(3):
310-1.
7.
Muslim A. Non-surgical treatment of hemorrhoids.
Specialist 1993; 9(3): 269-72.
8.
Khan AZ, Naqi SA, Gondal KM, Butt HA, Ahmed M. Comparison of band ligation with hemorrhoidectomy in
second and early third degree hemorrhoids. Annals 1998; 4(4): 59-61.
9.
Malik SN. Management of
prolapsed hemorrhoids. Ann KE Med Coll 1999; 5(2):
114-6.
10. Chaudhry MR, Ahmed MS, Abbas T.
Management of fourth degree hemorrhoids by lateral internal sphinceterotomy,
a safe alternative to emergency haemorrhoidectomy.
11. Elvosji SO. Immediate hemorrhoidectomy
for thrombosed fourth degree hemorrhoids. JPMA 1994;
44(11): 264-5.
12. Ho YH,
Seow Choen F, Tan M, Leong AFPK. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg.
1997; 84:1729-30.
13. Seow-Choen F. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy.
Pain or gain. Br J Surg 2001; (88): 1-3.
14. Ganio E, Altmare F, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Br J Surg. 2001; (88)
669-74.
15. Hancock
BD. How do surgeons treat hemorrhoids? Ann R Coll of Surg Engl 1982; 64:397-400.
16. Snook
S, Henry MM, Swash M.Faecal incontinence after anal
dilation Br.J Surg.1984; 71:617-8.
17. Ahmed
R, Khan MH, Rashid A, Management of haemorrhoids by
rubber band-ligation. Specialist 1995; 12(1): 79-81.
18. Aftab ML. Rubber band ligation in
the management of haemorrhoids.
19. Khan
SA, Kazmi SAR, Qureshi MI Chaudhry
MR, Shah STA. Experience of rubber band ligation with
suction gun in the management of haemorrhoids at
20. Murie JA Machkenzia J, Sim AJW. Comparison of rubber band ligation
and hemorrhoidectomy for second and third degree
hemorrhoids: a prospective clinical trial. Br J Surg
67:786-8.
21. Poen AC, Felt BRJ Cuesta M,
Deville W, Meuwissen SG. A randomized controlled
trial of RBL Vs infrared coagulation in the treatment of internal hemorrhoid
Euro J of Gastroenterology 2000, 12: 535-9.
22. Kumar
N, Paulvanan S,
_______________________________________________________________________________________
______
Address
For Correspondence:
Dr. Tanwir Khaliq, Department of
General Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, House
No.E-1/4, PIMS Colony, G-8/3, Islamabad. Tel: +92-51-9261165, +92-333-5215193
E-mail: ktanwir@hotmail.com