Experience with Endoscopy AT Bin
Jalawi Hospital K.S.A.
Background: Presentation of gastrointestinal disorders
may vary in different communities. This study was carried out in town of
Key Words: Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal disorders, Gastritis, Oesophagitis,
Introduction
Patients are referred for endoscopies for variety of reasons. Peptic ulcer
disease, with its complications remains the most common indication for gastroscopy,1
although nonulcer dyspepsia, dysphagia, haematemesis, removal of foreign
body from upper gastrointestinal tract, sclerotherapy, dilatation of stricture,
polypectomy, ERCP and other therapeutic procedures are also among the common
reasons for gastroscopy.2-4 Similarly lower gastrointestinal
bleeding, diarrhea, polypectomy and obtaining biopsy material are common indications
for colonoscopy 3,5.
This study was conducted at Bin Jalawi
hospital Hafoof Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). This is situated in eastern zone
of KSA. Patients were referred from 32 local health centers and six private
sector hospitals. This study reports an experience of 22 months of endoscopy
service without any time gap because of which it can be taken as reflective of
the prevalent trends existing in the practice of endoscopy in this particular
center. Findings of these examinations are presented and compared with the
observations reported by other workers and with the relevant data from other
parts of world.4,5,6
Material
and Methods
This study was carried out on all the patients referred to Bin Jalawi
hospital for endoscopy between December 1999 and September 2001. Patients referred
by primary health care physicians of Hafoof area, and referred from private
hospitals of same area and from inpatients and outpatients departments of
Oesophago-gastro-duodeno-scopic examina-tion
was performed on 199 patients. Out of these 12 patients needed sclerotherapy. Ethanolamine
was injected by injection wire through endoscope for the purpose of
sclerotherapy. Colonoscopy and sigm-oidoscopy was performed on 31 patients. Most
of the patients were repeatedly seen by their treating physicians and so were
adequately investigated. Electrocardiograms, X-rays of chest and abdomen,
abdominal sonography, liver function tests, Prothrombin time, partial
thromboplastin time, levels of urea and creatinine were available for all
patients. Data was collected prospectively to identify any peculiar trend.
Results
A total of 230 patient under went
various endoscopic procedures. 162 were male 68 were female.187 had upper GI endoscopy.
12 had injection sclerotheropy sessions for esophageal varices and 31 had sigmoidocolonoscopy. Thirteen patients were seropositive for
Hepatitis B Surface antigen and 21 subjects had evidence of Hepatitis C
antibodies.
Discussion
This study highlights several features observed on endoscopy. Endoscopic
procedures were undertaken more often in men as compare to women. This is in
accordance with the findings of other workers.3,4 Data presented in
this study has shown high proportion of smokers (63%). This is partly because
of the widely known fact that smoking is associated with upper gastrointestinal
disorders which require endosopy more often than non smokers.8 Gastroscopy
has been done mostly in subjects older than 35 year of age, whereas colonoscopy
is required relatively as frequently in younger individuals as in the older
population.
Table-1: Types of endoscopic procedures (n=230)
Procedures |
Numbers |
% |
Gastroscopy |
187 |
81.3 |
Colonoscopy |
31 |
13.48 |
Sclerotherapy |
12 |
5.22 |
Table-2: Nationalities of subjects (n=230)
Nationalities |
Numbers |
% |
Saudi |
192 |
83.4% |
Egyptian |
15 |
6.5% |
Indian |
12 |
5.2% |
Pakistani |
6 |
2.6% |
Syrian |
3 |
1.3% |
Turkish |
2 |
.9% |
Table-3: Age groups in relation with procedure
Age group (years) |
Gastroscopy (n=187) |
Colonoscopy (n=31) |
Sclerotherapy (n=12) |
15-35 |
48 (25.6%) |
14 (45.1%) |
2 (16.6%) |
36-55 |
63 (33.6%) |
9 (29%) |
8 (66.6%) |
56-75 |
74 (39.5%) |
7 (22.5%) |
2 (16.6%) |
>76 |
2 (1.06%) |
1 (0.3%) |
0 (0%) |
Table-4: Other significant
findings/characteristics (n=230)
Finding/Characteristic |
Number (%) |
Smokers |
145 (63%) |
HbSAg Positive |
13 (5.6%) |
Hepatitis C Ab |
21 (9.1%) |
Hb >9gms% |
46 (20%) |
Hb<9gms% |
184 (80%) |
Male |
162 (70%) |
Female |
68 (29.6%) |
Table-5: Diagnostic conclusions (n=230)
Endoscopic Impression |
Nos (%) |
Histopathological Diagnosis |
Nos (%) |
Antral gastritis |
75 (40%) |
Acute gastritis |
87 (46.5%) |
Varices |
19 (10%) |
Oesophagitis |
9 (4.8%) |
Gastic Ulcer |
4 (2.1%) |
Ca Oesophagus |
7 (3.7%) |
Duodenal Ulcer |
9 (4.8%) |
Gastric Lymphoma |
1 (.5%) |
Erosive gastritis |
17 (9.1%) |
Chronic gastritis |
29 (15.5%) |
Oesophagitis |
11 (5.8%) |
|
54 (28.8%) |
Duodenitis |
9 (4.8%) |
H.Pylori
status |
|
Ca
Cesophagus |
7 (3.7%) |
||
Gastric Neoplasm |
2 (1.05%) |
H Pylori Positive |
116 (62%) |
Hyperrugosity of gastric
mucosal folds |
6 (3.2%) |
H Pylori Negative |
71 (37.9%) |
|
28 (14.9%) |
|
|
Prevalence of H Pylori was high in this
series. In other studies done in the same region and neighbouring countries
even higher figures have been reported.9
Human gut has been included in temple of
wonder for ages. It was difficult to explore and see through large and tortuous
coils of intestine. Rigid open ended. Endoscope could offer visual examination
of proximal 40 cm and distal 25 cm of gut. Biopsies of there area were real
achievements. Semi flexible lens gastroscopies were developed during 1930s and
1940s 10. Though their use was limited to few centers but their
popularity grew very fast. Japanese had been trying hard to develop an
instrument which could help them to diagnose cancer of gut as early as possible
(which was prevalent in their country). Blind gastro-camera in 1950 and
flexible fibroptic endoscopy in 1960 was their real success.11
Modern Endoscopies are easy to use highly
maneuverable and have very high yield to scan the part under examination. Deep
duodenoscopy, cannulation of papilla of Vater for cholangio-pacreatography,
transendoscopic diathermy and laser photocoagulation have made the procedure of
high therapeutic value.12
Endoscopy is one of most important investigation
modality used in exploration of GI tract. Among most of other investigations
available including Barium contrast studies, ultrasound, Computed tomography
and Magnetic Resonance imaging, which are used visualize GI tract indirectly. Endoscopy has
its advantages. It is direct and provide excellent access to tissue. Investigation
techniques relevant to GIT have developed quite fast, but like many other
developments their use is restricted to few centers of excellence. In contrast facility
of endoscopy has emerged as readily accessible and useful way of GIT
investigation.
Radioisotope imaging to demonstrate esophageal reflux
using 99m Tc is another great achievement.
Technetium-Sulfur colloid is
used to calculate rate of gastric emptying. Extent of inflammation in
inflammatory bowel disease by using 99m Tc HMPAO Hexamethy &
prophyleme is another hallmark of modern isotopic application in
investigative medicine. Amine oxide
labeled white cells also give relatively accurate idea of extent of
inflammation in inflammatory disorders.
In the technique of endoscopy,
newly emerging Video endoscopic technology is impressive development where
expensive fragile fiber is being replaced by more durable laser channel and
electronic circuit.10,11
Angulation, water injection, suction & passage of biopsy forceps or brushes
for obtaining tissue samples can be used with much more ease.
Virtual colonoscopy is an astonishing
development in which computed tomographic image develops and reconstructs
colonic image into 3 dimensional way which exactly simulate interior of colon
and is much easier, convenient and safer.12
Conclusion
Trends shown in this study are in accordance
with the other works. Male undergo endoscopy more often than females. Smokers
are more likely to have endoscopy as compare to nonsmokers. Prevalence of
hepatitis C antibodies and HBsAg are observed high as reported in the studies
done in general population.13 Patients who need endosopy and have
low hemoglobin levels are likely to have positive findings when procedure is
undertaken.
Patients
older than 35 year are more likely to need endoscopy when compared with younger
subjects. Data included different nationals and is more and less comparable to
the data for
References
1.
Haslett C. Upper GI
endoscopy in principal and practice of Medicine. 19th edition. Edingburgh:
Chuchill Livingstone; 2002.
2.
Cotton PB, Willium
CB. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: apractical approach. 4th edn.
3.
Katon R.M.
Experimental control of gastrointestinal Hemmhorage via the endoscope: a new
era dawns. Gastroentrology 1976;70:272-6.
4.
Fruhmorgen P,
Bodem F, Reidenbach HD, Kaduk B, Demling L. Endoscopic Laser coagulation of Bleeding gastrointestinal
lesions. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1976;23:73-9.
5.
Stein H, Helen MF.
Science Medicine & Future virtual colonoscopy. BMJ 1999;319:1249-52.
6.
Al Quorain A, Satti
MB, Al-Hamadan A, al Gassab G, al Freihi H, al Gindan Y. Pattern of
gastrointestinal disease in eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Endoscopic evaluation
of 2982 patients. Trop Geogr Med 1991;43(1-2):203-8.
7.
Nkrumah KN. Endoscopic
evaluation of upper abdominal symptoms in adult patients at
8.
Shigemi J,
9.
Bani-Hani KE, Hammourabi
SM. Prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori in
10.
Knyrim K, Seidlitz
H, Vakil N, Classen M. Perspective in”electronic endoscopy”.Past, present and
future of fibers and CCDs in medical
endoscopes. Endoscopy 1990;22 Suppl 1:2-8.
11.
Epstein M. Fiber
optics in medicine. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1982;7(2):79-120..
12.
Panel M, Alex F.
Recent development in Gastroentrology
BMJ 2002;325:1399-1402.
13.
El Hazmi MM. Prevalence
of HBV, HCV, HIV-1,2 and HLTV I/II infection among blood donors in a teaching
hospital in central region of Saudia Arabia. Saudi Med J 2004;25(1):26-33.
______________________________________________________________________________
Address for Correspondence:
Dr. Aftab Rabbani, Department of Medicine,
Email: draftabrabbani@hotmail.com